Event Security Services
Risk-led event security for venues, private functions and public events, including access control, licensed personnel and incident coordination.
View this pageProtective security guidance
Understand the current status, likely scope, standard and enhanced duties, and practical preparation steps for Martyn’s Law.
The Home Office has published statutory guidance to help responsible persons prepare. Current scope and commencement information should always be checked before relying on this guide.
Premises are likely to qualify when all of these conditions apply:
A qualifying event is likely to require all of the following:
Thresholds alone do not determine scope. Use the official guidance and flowcharts for the exact premises or event.
All in-scope responsible persons will need to notify the SIA and ensure appropriate, reasonably practicable public-protection procedures covering:
Enhanced-tier premises and qualifying events will also need appropriate, reasonably practicable public-protection measures, documented reasoning, an up-to-date compliance document and, where the responsible person is an organisation, a senior individual.
The responsible person is normally the individual or organisation controlling the premises for the relevant use, or controlling the event premises for the event. Responsibility cannot simply be transferred to a security contractor.
It means weighing likely effectiveness against the time, cost and difficulty of implementation in the circumstances of the premises or event. It is not a command to buy every available security product.
A provider can contribute operational knowledge about access control, licensed roles, incident communication, restricted areas, crowd interfaces and deployment instructions. It cannot become the responsible person merely by contract, certify legal compliance or replace the organisation’s own decisions.
The Act has been passed, but most substantive requirements were not yet commenced on 30 July 2026. The current expectation is spring 2027, subject to regulations.
No. The building, use, expected attendance and exclusions all matter. Use the official guidance rather than the threshold alone.
Yes. Current official guidance says the reasonable expectation includes staff.
No. Government guidance expressly says specialist services should not be necessary for compliance. A provider may support operational security where the risk and event plan justify it.
No. Contractors can perform tasks and provide advice, but the responsible person remains responsible.
Not merely to satisfy the standard-tier procedure duty. The Home Office says standard-tier requirements focus on practical procedures rather than mandatory physical alterations or equipment purchases.
We can discuss operational event-security duties while the responsible person retains control of legal compliance.